We maintain open source raw decoding library, LibRaw, used in more than a few raw converters, not only as program modules, but also in a way of documentation. Lyn does read ApolloOne ratings but sadly DxO Photo Lab and FastRawViewer do not. It doesnt seem ApolloOne writes ratings which other applications can view either. Does not consistently read XMP style Bridge/FastRawViewer ratings. Since we do know what raw is, we came up with an independent Fujifilm compressed raw decoder, AFAIK the first one. Turns out toolbar filtering doesnt work but menu filtering does work. Raw data is a rasterized image file, and can be viewed as such.
FASTRAWVIEWER 1.3 CRACK FOR MAC OS
Also, FastPictureViewer does not seem to be available for Mac OS X.ĪCR is a converter, not displaying raw (it does not need to, actually), applying a lot of adjustments to data behind the scenes to beautify the image, those adjustments including silent exposure compensation (brightening in fact, known as "baseline exposure"), which may leave a false impression of a properly exposed image when it is not. Such adjustments allow to cull with more confidence and to save time in raw conversion using Adobe products. No, FastPictureViewer does not have a similar feature set, not in the least because it does not offer white balance, brightness (exposure slider in ACR/Lr), and contrast adjustments compatible with ACR and Lightroom. Raw histogram, statistics, over- and under-exposure indication in FastRawViewer are all calculated before application of white balance, preventing false impression of over-exposure in red and blue channels and allowing to estimate under-exposure accurately. You can compare our raw histogram with histograms in other viewers and see that they are very different. To compare, open a raw file and press "J". You can check with your raw files to see how the embedded JPEG and it's histogram (that's what image viewers normally display) differ from raw. It is a very good picture viewer, but in our minds it does not address the needs of raw shooters, and especially of those who want to move from shooting JPEGs to shooting raw and may want to adjust their exposure strategy accordingly.Įvaluating raw based on embedded JPEG or uncontrolled rendition of raw data may be rather misleading:Įmbedded JPEG histogram below suggests extreme overexposure in red and blue channels (more than 1.5 stops) and some clipping of the green channel:īut the raw data is far from clipping, it is a tad underexposed in fact: No, FastPictureViewer is not a raw viewer, not showing even a raw data histogram AFAIK.
0 kommentar(er)
